1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 259 A.D.2d
  5. 259 A.D.2d 760 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. GRANSTON

259 A.D.2d 760 (1999)

688 N.Y.S.2d 172

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCIS GRANSTON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 29, 1999.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the jury verdict was repugnant is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not make this claim before the jury was discharged (see, People v Alfaro, 66 N.Y.2d 985, 987; CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the contention is without merit. A verdict shall be set aside as repugnant only when it is inherently inconsistent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases