AVR, INC. v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK

No. C7-98-516.

585 N.W.2d 411 (1998)

AVR, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 15, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald S. Duffy, William Christopher Penwell, Anthony J. Gleekel, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A., Minneapolis, (for appellant).

Roger N. Knutson, Thomas M. Scott, Campbell Knutson, P.A., Eagan, (for respondent).

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and AMUNDSON and WILLIS, JJ.


OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant AVR, Inc., challenges the district court's order granting summary judgment to respondent City of St. Louis Park, claiming that the city's zoning ordinance that establishes a two-year amortization period for appellant's preexisting nonconforming use is unreasonable and violates appellant's right to equal protection of the laws. We affirm.

FACTS

AVR owns and operates a ready-mix concrete plant in the City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases