1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 217 Wis.2d
  5. 217 Wis.2d 773 (1998)
 

STAUDT v. FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL

Nos. 97-0192, 97-0194.

217 Wis.2d 773 (1998)

580 N.W.2d 361

Steven STAUDT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL, Sentry Insurance, Wisconsin Health and Hospital Association, Ohio Hospital Insurance Company, and Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, Defendants-Respondents. Dennis DVORAK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBIA HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., Columbia Hospital, Inc., Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan, St. Paul Fire and Casualty, Continental Insurance Company, and Wisconsin Patients' Compensation Fund, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 17, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Ronald S. Goldser of Zimmerman Reed, P.L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and Sentry Insurance, the cause was submitted on the brief of John A. Nelson and Terry E. Nilles of von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C., of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, the cause was submitted on the brief of William H. Levit, Jr., Michael B. Apfeld, Wisconsin A. Ostrow, and Sarah B. Ludwick of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents Columbia Health System, Inc., Columbia Hospital, Inc., and Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan, the cause was submitted on the brief of Lori Gendelman and Jeffrey J.P. Conta of Otjen, Van Ert, Stangle, Lieb and Weir, S.C., of Milwaukee.

Before Fine, Curley and Myse, JJ.

FINE, J.

Steven Staudt and Dennis Dvorak appeal from the trial court's summary judgment dismissal of their claims against Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, its insurers, and Columbia Hospital and its insurers. Staudt's and Dvorak's cases were consolidated for decision before the trial court, and are consolidated on appeal. We affirm.

[1, 2]

Summary judgment is used to determine whether there are any disputed facts that require a trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases