PEOPLE v. EMMAL

No. G021290.

80 Cal.Rptr.2d 907 (1998)

68 Cal.App.4th 1313

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald Jay EMMAL, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied March 24, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry D. Whatley, Santa Barbara, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Esteban Hernandez, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

BEDSWORTH, J.

A jury convicted Ronald Jay Emmal of transporting methamphetamine but found him not guilty of possessing it for sale. The trial court then found two "strike" allegations and four one-year prior allegations to be true. Emmal claims (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the trial court provided the jury a defective definition

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases