HARLESS v. NASH

No. 90085.

959 P.2d 27 (1998)

1998 OK CIV APP 79

William Jerry HARLESS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dale Frederick NASH, Defendant, and Weatherford U.S., Inc., Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

May 19, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Lyle Clemens, Oklahoma City, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Gerald E. Durbin, Durbin, Larimore & Bialick, Oklahoma City, for Defendant Dale Fredrick Nash,

Anton J. Rupert, Steven W. Ballard, Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, for Defendant/Appellee Weatherford U.S., Inc.


Release for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

OPINION

BUETTNER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant/Appellee Weatherford U.S., Inc. moved for summary judgment in its favor on the ground that any negligence committed by its employee, Nash, occurred while Nash was returning to work. Under the "going and coming rule," an employer is not liable for damages caused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases