Defendant's contentions that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of the complainant's testimony that she sought an order of protection on the day following the sexual assault and by the prosecutor's comment upon this fact in summation have not been preserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the testimony was properly admitted as a "prompt outcry" (People v McDaniel...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
