1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 253 A.D.2d
  5. 253 A.D.2d 711 (1998)
 

WASSON v. MENDIK

253 A.D.2d 711 (1998)

678 N.Y.S.2d 15

Susanne Wasson, Appellant, v. Bernard H. Mendik, Individually and as General Partner in M Eleven Associates, M/F Associates and M/S Associates, et al., Defendants, and Newbridge Networks Inc., et al., Respondents. Newbridge Networks, Sued Herein as Newbridge Networks Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 29, 1998

Sanctions were properly imposed upon plaintiff's attorneys for frivolously proceeding to jury selection while intending not to proceed to trial (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]). The court's decisions adequately set forth its reasons for purposes of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2 (see, Rachel's Trousseau v Warshaw Woollen Assocs., 249 A.D.2d 148), namely, the incurring of unnecessary expense by defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases