The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues relating to credibility and reliability of identification testimony were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings.
Viewing the evidence as a whole, we find that a sufficient foundation was established for the admission of the police officer's testimony as to the witness's out-of-court identification of defendants, where the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.