1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 162 F.3d
  5. 162 F.3d 795 (1998)
 

CAUSEY v. BALOG

No. 96-2350.

162 F.3d 795 (1998)

James CAUSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BALOG, Individually, and as current Director of Department of Public Works; Raymond Holland, Individually and as former Assistant Head of Bureau of Transportation of Department of Public Works; Dave Montgomery, Individually and as current Head of Bureau of Transportation of Department of Public Works; Keith Scroggins, Individually and as current Head of Personnel Department of Public Works; Herman Williams, Individually and as prior Commissioner of Department of Transportation; Kurt Schmoke, Mayor of the City of Baltimore; Mary Pat Clarke; Jacqueline McClean; The Board of Estimates of The City of Baltimore; John L. Cain; Nicholas C. D'Adamo, Jr.; Perry Sfikas; Anthony J. Ambridge; Paula Johnson Branch; Carl Stokes; Wilbur E. Cunningham; Martin E. Curran; Martin O'Malley; Lawrence A. Bell; Sheila Dixon; Agnes Welch; Vera P. Hall; Iris G. Reeves; Rochelle Spector; Joseph DiBlasi; Timothy J. Murphy; Melvin L. Stukes; The City Council of Baltimore City, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided December 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Mercedes Casado Samborsky, Joppatowne, Maryland, for Appellant. Michael George Raimondi, Office of the City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: James S. Ruckle, Jr., George J. Philipou, Office of the City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge MAGILL wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge:

James Causey, a sixty-two-year-old white male employee of the City of Baltimore, was transferred and eventually discharged as part of a reorganization and reduction in force. He brought this discrimination action under Title VII, the ADEA, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases