1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 60 Cal.App.4th
  5. 60 Cal.App.4th 888 (1998)
 

CHING v. SAN FRANCISCO BD. OF PERMIT APPEALS

Docket No. A074816.

60 Cal.App.4th 888 (1998)

ALICE CHING et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, Defendant and Respondent; HARSCH INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

January 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Andrew M. Zacks, Paul F. Utrecht and Richard R. Dale for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Gen Fujioka for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

PHELAN, P.J.

Harsch Investment Corporation (Harsch) appeals from a judgment granting the petition of Alice Ching, Bai Sung Ho, Kam O. Lau and Ke Qin Shen (collectively referred to as Ching) for a peremptory writ of mandate vacating a decision of the San Francisco Board of Permit Appeals (the Board). Harsch contends the judgment must be reversed because Ching's petition was untimely filed under the 90-day limitation period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases