Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's unpreserved contention, the proof was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant either knew that a nonparticipant in the arson was in the building at the time the defendant started the fire, or that the circumstances were such as to render the presence of another person in the building a reasonable possibility (see, Penal Law § 150.15). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
