PORTNOF v. PORTNOF


253 A.D.2d 675 (1998)

677 N.Y.S.2d 468

Paul Portnof, Appellant, v. Michele Portnof (Ditchik), Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 22, 1998


We agree with the IAS Court that the parties' divorce judgment does not require defendant to use only "participating providers" under plaintiff's health insurance plan. The foregoing is not to be understood as holding that plaintiff is required to pay for any unreimbursed expenses incurred by defendant in using a nonparticipating provider (see, Warshaw v Warshaw, 243 A.D.2d 394), this being the issue that was raised on defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases