Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the defendant former wife attorney's fees, as reasonable inferences drawn from the record support a finding that the plaintiff, an attorney representing himself pro se, made a motion to vacate a prior order primarily to harass and maliciously injure her (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]).
The plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.