MARINO v. HACKMAN


551 Pa. 369 (1998)

710 A.2d 1108

Charles and Mollie MARINO, Appellants, v. James Harry HACKMAN, Jay Rollman & Sons and William Rollman Truck Rentals, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 2, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis E. Boyle, Coudersport, for Charles and Mollie Marino.

Harry D. McMunigal, Reading, for James Harry Hackman, et al.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.


OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We must determine whether non-docket activity may be considered when deciding whether a case should be terminated for inactivity pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901.1 For the reasons set forth herein, we hold that non-docket activity may be considered.

On March 4, 1992, Appellants filed a complaint in Berks County seeking damages for injuries allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases