MARYLAND CAS. CO. v. THERM-O-DISC, INC.

No. 96-1192.

137 F.3d 780 (1998)

The MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, as Subrogee of Eileen K. Gitelson; Eileen K. Gitelson; Selma Investment Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THERM-O-DISC, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant, and Whirlpool Corporation; Emerson Electric Company, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided February 27, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: John M. Kobayashi, Kobayashi & Associates, P.C., Denver, CO, for Appellant. Mark E. Opalisky, Cozen & O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:1

This appeal requires us to consider the sufficiency of an evidentiary determination made by the district court. Specifically, we are called upon to decide whether the district court properly carried out its function as evidentiary "gatekeeper" pursuant to the Supreme Court's mandate in Daubert v. Merrell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases