1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 132 F.3d
  5. 132 F.3d 784 (1998)
 

WILDBERGER v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

No. 95-1614.

132 F.3d 784 (1998)

Robert W. WILDBERGER, Jr., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Wildberger, Jr., appearing pro se, was on the briefs for petitioner.

James A. Garcia, argued the cause for amicus curiae on the side of petitioner, with whom Dana C. Contratto, Washington, DC, appointed by the court, was on the briefs.

James F. Blandford, Attorney, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. David M. Smith, Solicitor, and William E. Persina, Attorney, Washington, DC, were on the brief. Pamela P. Johnson, Attorney, and William R. Tobey, Deputy Solicitor, Washington, DC, entered appearances.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

Under the Civil Service Reform Act, codified at Title 5 of the U.S. Code, the Federal Labor Relations Authority ("FLRA" or "the Authority") is authorized to address charges of unfair labor practices against federal employers, see generally 5 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7135 (1994); § 7116(a)-(c) (defining unfair labor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases