1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 20 F.Supp.2d
  5. 20 F.Supp.2d 888 (1998)
 

ROGERS v. HOVE

No. CIV. A. 97-7076.

20 F.Supp.2d 888 (1998)

John ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. Andrew C. HOVE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

October 28, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alice W. Ballard, Samuel & Ballard, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Richard Mentzinger, Jr., Office of U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, PA, James B. Clark, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Newark, N.J., for Defendants Andrew C. Hove, Ricki Tiger Helfer, F.D.I.C.

Brandon A. Burnett, Washington, DC, for Defendant Donna A. Tanoue.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

KATZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff in this case alleges employment discrimination by an agency of the federal government, bringing claims of age discrimination under the ADEA and claims of retaliation under both the ADEA and Title VII. Because the defendant employer is the federal government, the ADEA does not provide for a jury trial. See 29 U.S.C. § 633a; Lehman v. Nakshian,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases