DOREY v. ESTATE OF SPICER


715 A.2d 182 (1998)

1998 ME 202

Peter M. DOREY v. ESTATE of William C. SPICER, Jr. et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided August 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen P. Beale, Skelton, Taintor & Abbott, P.A., Auburn, for plaintiff.

Stephen Hessert, Paul F. Driscoll, Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, Portland, for Robert Senger and others, defendants.

William L. Plouffe, Drummond, Woodsum & MacMahon, Portland, for Town of Bridgton, defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, and SAUFLEY, JJ.


SAUFLEY, Justice.

[¶ 1] Peter M. Dorey appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) declaring that he does not have the right to control the flow of water through the dam at the outlet of Foster Pond in Bridgton, thereby raising and lowering the Pond's water level and affecting the property of the pondfront landowners, in order to generate a private supply of electricity. We affirm the judgment.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases