OREFICE v. ADR


719 A.2d 169 (1998)

315 N.J. Super. 493

James OREFICE and Roseann Orefice, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ADR, a New Jersey General Partnership and American Arbitration Association, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James V. Segreto, Haledon, for plaintiffs-appellants (Segreto & Segreto, attorneys; James V. Segreto, of counsel and on the brief; Paul A. Segreto, on the brief).

Martin S. Zipern, Westfield, for defendants-respondents (Garrubbo & Romankow, attorneys; Mr. Zipern, on the brief).

Before Judges D'ANNUNZIO, CUFF and COLLESTER.


The Opinion of the Court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

This appeal arises out of a residential construction dispute and involves application of the Construction Lien Law (the Act) enacted to be effective in April 1994. L.1993, c. 318; N.J.S.A. 2A:44A-1 to 38. The Act establishes procedures for the imposition of liens in favor of contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who provide "work, services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases