1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 587 N.W.2d
  5. 587 N.W.2d 299 (1998)
 

STATE v. DUMAS

No. C0-98-1152.

587 N.W.2d 299 (1998)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. William Michael DUMAS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied February 24, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul, and Francis J. Rondoni, Mark J. Schneider, Brian A. Lutes, Rondoni, MacMillan & Schneider, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Joel Heiligman, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the district court's dismissal of gross misdemeanor DWI and test refusal charges. Appellant asserts the district court erred in determining that Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(c)(2), violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the ex post facto clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.

FACTS

The legislature, in 1997, enacted certain amendments to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases