BRUGGEMAN v. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. C9-98-212.

583 N.W.2d 299 (1998)

William L. BRUGGEMAN, et al., Appellants, v. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted October 29, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Herr, James F. Killian, Michael C. McCarthy, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Gary A. Van Cleve, James M. Susag, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Bloomington, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., CRIPPEN, and DAVIES, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant sellers challenge the trial court's summary judgment, asserting that the merger doctrine does not apply to a provision in an option agreement that permitted them to repurchase the property if the buyer failed to develop it within two years. Because appellants' repurchase right, which could only be claimed two years after the closing, was both a condition subsequent and collateral to the executed deed, we conclude that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases