HARRIS v. UNION PACIFIC R.R.

No. 97-1501.

141 F.3d 740 (1998)

Paula L. HARRIS and Kim D. Walton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 9, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. O'Donaghue, Chicago, IL, Reed Millsaps (argued), C.R. Vince and Associates, Northbrook, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Daniel R. LaFave (argued), Union Pacific Railroad Company, Law Department, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before EASTERBROOK, MANION, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

In 1993 the Union Pacific Railroad sought permission of the Interstate Commerce Commission to acquire the Chicago and North Western Railway. The railroads contemplated that approximately 800 employees would be transferred after the merger and that 900 jobs would be abolished. The Commission gave its assent on February 21, 1995, subject to the standard New York Dock conditions for treatment of employees adversely affected by the transaction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases