MADORE v. MAINE LAND USE REGULATION COM'N


715 A.2d 157 (1998)

1998 ME 178

Armand S. MADORE et al. v. MAINE LAND USE REGULATION COMMISSION et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided July 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine R. Connors (orally), Helen L. Edmonds, Matthew D. Manahan, Pierce Atwood, Portland, for plaintiffs.

Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Jeffrey Pidot, Asst. Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, for defendant Land Use Regulation Comm.

Richard A. Spencer, Kaighn Smith, Jr., Drummond, Woodsum & MacMahon, Portland, for intervenor Mooselookmeguntic Improvement Ass'n.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, and SAUFLEY, JJ.


SAUFLEY, Justice.

[¶ 1] Armand S. and Kathleen G. Madore appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) dismissing their complaint for lack of standing. On appeal, the Madores argue that the court erred in concluding that they lacked standing to litigate their M.R.Civ.P. 80C appeal and federal Fair Housing Act claim, and erred in denying their requests for reconsideration. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases