HERRMANN v. McMENOMY & SEVERSON

No. C2-98-388.

583 N.W.2d 283 (1998)

Al HERRMANN, et al., Appellants, v. McMENOMY & SEVERSON, et al., Respondents, Bolin, Rucinski & Company, Ltd., et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted October 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Stoneking, Stoneking Law Office, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Richard J. Thomas, Bryon G. Ascheman, Burke & Thomas, Saint Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., HUSPENI and SCHULTZ, JJ.


OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellants Al Herrmann and Al Herrmann Construction, Inc., challenge the district court's conclusion that their legal malpractice action is time-barred. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

For purposes of summary judgment, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. In 1986, respondents are attorneys who assisted appellant Al Herrmann, the sole owner and employee of appellant Al Herrmann Construction, Inc. (AHC), in establishing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases