Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
There is no merit to the petitioners' claim that the July 2, 1996, public hearing was held in violation of the Town Law. Although the continued hearing ordered by the Supreme Court was not held within the prescribed time limitations set forth under Town Law § 54 (4), the hearing was properly noticed anew under Town Law § 54 (3). The legal notice, in addition to containing a detailed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.