TAVARES v. UNUM CORP.

No. Civ.A. 96-614L.

17 F.Supp.2d 69 (1998)

Arlene TAVARES, Plaintiff, v. UNUM CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.

September 2, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin F. Bowen, Providence, RI, for Plaintiff.

Katherine K. Russum, Benjamin V. White, III, Brooks R. Magratten, Vetter & White, Providence, RI, for Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Unum Corporation ("UNUM" or "defendant") pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the cross motion of Arlene Tavares ("Tavares" or "plaintiff") for partial summary judgment. At issue is whether defendant, a Maine Corporation violated 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., known as the Employee Retirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases