1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 695 N.E.2d
  5. 695 N.E.2d 162 (1998)
 

HARVEY v. HARVEY

No. 37A04-9705-CV-198.

695 N.E.2d 162 (1998)

Richard HARVEY, Appellant-Respondent, v. Margaret HARVEY, Appellee-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 3, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Casey, Blaney, Casey & Walton, Rensselaer, for Appellant-Respondent.

Tula Kavadias, Melissa Rohrer, Kavadias & Associates, Crown Point, for Appellee-Petitioner.

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

Richard Harvey ("Husband") appeals the trial court's dissolution decree, claiming that the trial court's findings do not support its judgment, that Husband's early retirement supplemental benefits ("supplemental benefits") should not have been considered marital property subject to division, that the trial court erred by relying on unisex mortality tables, and that the trial court should have used Husband's expert's fair market valuation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases