COX v. DINE-A-MATE, INC.

No. COA97-1157.

501 S.E.2d 353 (1998)

David B. COX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DINE-A-MATE, INC., Entertainment Publications, Inc., and CUC International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. by Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro; Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, L.L.P. by Anthony Fox, Charlotte; and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP by Helene D. Jaffe and Scott Martin, New York, NY, for defendants-appellants.

Floyd and Jacobs, L.L.P. by James H. Slaughter and Robert V. Shaver, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.


SMITH, Judge.

Defendants assign error to the trial court's denial of defendants' motion to dismiss, contending that the trial court should have enforced the forum selection clause in plaintiff's employment agreement with Dine-A-Mate. First, we examine whether the appeal on this issue is properly before the Court. Generally, a party has no right to appeal an interlocutory order. N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. Page, 119 N.C. App. 730, 733, 460...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases