Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the six-photo array was unduly suggestive is without merit. There is no requirement that the defendant be surrounded by individuals nearly identical to him in appearance during identification procedures. The array here does not draw the viewer's attention to the defendant's photograph, nor does the lighting background of the defendant's photo make it stand out from the others (see, People v Font...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.