Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that an expanded charge on the issue of identification was necessary because the only evidence linking him to the crime was the testimony of the undercover officer is without merit. The evidence at trial consisted of the testimony of an undercover police officer who had a face-to-face transaction with the defendant under good lighting conditions. The officer transmitted to his backup team a description...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
