NEAL v. CITY OF HARVEY, ILL.

No. 96 C 1464.

1 F.Supp.2d 849 (1998)

Eugene NEAL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HARVEY, ILLINOIS; David Johnson; et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle M. Klute, Kenneth J. Wysoglad & Associates, Chicago, IL, David A. Blutcher, Chicago, IL, Stuart Joseph Bobrow, Law Offices of Stuart J. Bobrow & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Eugene Neal.

John A. Hiskes, Timothy Charles Lapp, Buikema, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnell & Marovich Ltd., South Holland, IL, Michael Jay Marovich, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnel & Marovich, Ltd., Orland Park, IL, for City of Harvey, Illinois.

John A. Hiskes, Timothy Charles Lapp, James D. Montgomery, John Gergets, James D. Montgomery & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Michael Jay Marovich, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnel & Marovich, Ltd., Orland Park, IL, for David Johnson.

John A. Hiskes, Timothy Charles Lapp, Stephen Aron Glickman, Stephen A. Glickman, P.C., Chicago, IL, Michael Jay Marovich, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnel & Marovich, Ltd., Orland Park, IL, for Ronnie Burg.

John A. Hiskes, Timothy Charles Lapp, Ronald Kawanna, Jr., Lawrence P. Gulotta, Gulotta & Kawanna, Calumet City, IL, Michael Jay Marovich, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnel & Marovich, Ltd., Orland Park, IL, for Lawrence Patterson, Ron Cross, Bryan Patterson.

John A. Hiskes, Timothy Charles Lapp, Michael Jay Marovich, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnel & Marovich, Ltd., Orland Park, IL, for Art Nealy.

Ronald Kawanna, Jr., Edward A. Antonietti, Lawrence P. Gulotta, Gulotta & Kawanna, Calumet City, IL, for James McGee.

Linda L. Listrom, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for Sylvia Gomez.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Eugene Neal, brought suit alleging constitutional violations and state law claims arising out of his arrest as a suspect in the shooting of a Harvey police officer. The defendants, the City of Harvey and various Harvey police officers, move for summary judgment on all of Mr. Neal's claims. For the following reasons, the defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases