PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his conviction for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. The State cross-appeals an evidentiary ruling made by the trial court during appellant's trial. Finding that there was insufficient evidence that appellant conspired to traffic in cocaine, we reverse his conviction. Under the facts of this case, we dismiss the State's cross-appeal without further comment. See United States v. Scott,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.