1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 62 Cal.App.4th
  5. 62 Cal.App.4th 766 (1998)
 

BROWN v. FSR BROKERAGE, INC.

Docket No. B114125.

62 Cal.App.4th 766 (1998)

HARRY BROWN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FSR BROKERAGE, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

March 26, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Asaro, Keagy, Freeland & McKinley and Steven A. McKinley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Loeterman, Shulkin & Kraemer and Samuel H. Kraemer for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

EPSTEIN, J.

Common sense and ancient wisdom join the law in teaching that an agent is not permitted to simultaneously serve two principals whose interests conflict about the matter served — at least, not without full disclosure and consent from both. In the context of brokered real estate transactions, this principle is codified in Civil Code sections 2079.14 and 2079...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases