1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 711 A.2d
  5. 711 A.2d 112 (1998)
 

WAGSHAL v. RIGLER

No. 96-CV-549.

711 A.2d 112 (1998)

Jerome S. WAGSHAL, Appellant, v. Douglas V. RIGLER and Julius Kaplan, Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 14, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome S. Wagshal, pro se appellant.

Douglas V. Rigler, pro se appellee, with whom Julius Kaplan, pro se appellee, was on the brief.

Before TERRY, STEADMAN and RUIZ, Associate Judges.

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Unlike its federal counterpart, Superior Court Civil Rule 4(m) requires that both service of process and the filing of proof of such service be accomplished within sixty days of the filing of every civil complaint. On April 28, 1995, appellant Jerome S. Wagshal, a retired attorney appearing pro se, filed suit against appellees Douglas V. Rigler and Julius Kaplan, also pro se attorneys.1 Wagshal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases