Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents.
The appellant's argument concerning the applicability of the savings clause of the Federal Occupation Health and Safety Act (29 USC § 653 [b] [4]) was not raised before the trial court and is therefore not properly before this Court on appeal (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [3]).
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.