1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 575 N.W.2d
  5. 575 N.W.2d 233 (1998)
 

WARD v. MIDCOM, INC.

Nos. 20008, 20015.

575 N.W.2d 233 (1998)

Dean WARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIDCOM, INC., Defendant and Appellee.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided February 4, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark V. Meierhenry of Danforth, Meierhenry & Meierhenry, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and appellant.

Monte Walz and Keith A. Gauer of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, Sioux Falls, for defendant and appellee.

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This matter arises out of three contracts executed between the defendant corporation and an employee/shareholder. The disagreement centers on the enforceability of an amended stock purchase agreement and its noncompetition clause. The trial court ruled (1) the noncompetition provision was unenforceable, and (2) the amended stock purchase agreement was not severable and therefore also unenforceable. Midcom appeals (1) and Ward appeals ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases