Connie J. MOTOLA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LABOR & INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION and City of New Berlin, Respondents-Respondents,
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument May 5, 1998.
Decided June 30, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the petitioner-appellant there were briefs (in the Court of Appeals) by Bruce F. Ehlke, Aaron N. Halstead and Shneidman, Myers, Dowling, Blumenfield, Ehlke, Hawks & Domer, Madison and oral argument by Aaron N. Halstead.
For the respondent-respondent, LIRC, the cause was argued by David C. Rice, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief (in the Court of Appeals) was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
For the respondent-respondent, City of New Berlin, there was a brief (in the Court of Appeals) by Elizabeth A. McDuffie, Brent P. Bendrud and Krukowski & Costello, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Elizabeth McDuffie.
Amicus curiae was filed (in the Court of Appeals) by James W. Conway, city attorney and Susan M. Love and Davis & Kuelthau, Milwaukee for the City of Kenosha.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. JANINE P. GESKE, J.
The court of appeals certified two questions to this court: (1) Under Braatz v. LIRC,174 Wis.2d 286, 496 N.W.2d 597 (1993), may any employer limit its married employees to coverage under one health insurance policy? (2) When bringing an action under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, Wis. Stat. §§ 111.31-111.395 (1993-94),1
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.