1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 727 (1998)
 

BARRENDA L. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Nos. B118843, B121277.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 727 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 794

BARRENDA L. et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; County of Los Angeles, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 22, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pate & Pate and Linda Wallace Pate; Voorhies & Kramer, Richard C. Voorhies and R. Brian Kramer, Los Angeles, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Collins, Collins, Muir & Traver, Pasadena, and Peter Stacy, for Real Party in Interest.

HASTINGS, Associate Justice.

In these related writ proceedings we conclude that the County of Los Angeles and various of its employees, real parties in interest, have failed to demonstrate good cause to require petitioners to answer questions at depositions relating to sexual encounters other than those directly at issue in this litigation. We also conclude that real parties have failed to demonstrate good cause to require an independent psychological examination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases