Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
We agree with the defendant that the trial court erred by permitting a third party to testify as to the complainant's prior identification of the defendant as the perpetrator. The identification testimony from the complainant at trial was ambiguous, and there...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
