1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 307 N.J.
  5. 307 N.J. Super. 493 (1998)
 

STATE, TP. OF PENNSAUKEN v. SCHAD

307 N.J. Super. 493 (1998)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES SCHAD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 3, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Levy and John A. Underwood, argued the cause for appellant (Underwood & Micklin, attorneys; Mr. Levy, on the briefs).

Michael E. Joyce, argued the cause for respondent (Kelley, Wardell & Craig, attorneys; Mr. Joyce, on the briefs).

Before Judges LONG, KLEINER and KIMMELMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KIMMELMAN, J.A.D.

Before the court are two separate appeals from distinct trials de novo in the Law Division, wherein defendant was twice convicted of violating provisions of the Township of Pennsauken (Township) sign ordinance. The violations charged in both cases were identical, but the cases related to different points in time. We ordered that the appeals be argued back-to-back. Since both matters involve the same...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases