1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 144 F.3d
  5. 144 F.3d 653 (1998)
 

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS

No. 97-3120.

144 F.3d 653 (1998)

In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS, Jane Roe and John Doe. INTERVENOR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Wyrsch (Jacqueline A. Cook, with him on the briefs), Wyrsch Hobbs Mirakian & Lee, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Tanya J. Treadway, Assistant United States Attorney (Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, with her on the brief), Kansas City, KS, for Appellee.

Before ANDERSON and KELLY, Circuit Judges, and BRETT, District Judge.

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Intervenor-Appellant1 appeals from the district court's order compelling the testimony of two attorneys, John Doe and Jane Roe, before a federal grand jury. He argues that the district court erred by: (1) applying the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege to compel the attorneys' testimony; (2) applying the exception too broadly and refusing to review the questions to be asked of the attorneys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases