U.S. PAROLE COM'N v. NOBLE

No. 96-SP-578.

711 A.2d 85 (1998)

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellant, v. Matthew NOBLE, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth H. Danello, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and John R. Fisher, Thomas J. Tourish, Jr., and John M. Facciola, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellant.

Beverly G. Dyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with whom A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, was on the brief, for appellee.

Mary L. Wilson, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Jo Anne Robinson, Interim Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for amicus curiae the District of Columbia.

James Klein and David Reiser, Public Defender Service, filed a memorandum in support of the petition for rehearing en banc for amicus curiae the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia.

Richard Eisenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Western District of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, filed a petition for rehearing en banc on behalf of James F. Johnson as amicus curiae.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, RUIZ, and REID, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM:

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit certified the following question to this court, pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-723 (1995):

Under District of Columbia law, ... did the United States Parole Commission properly interpret sections 24-206(a) and 24-431(a) of the District of Columbia Code in deciding that, after revocation of a person's parole, time that the person spent on parole before revocation cannot be credited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases