The Special Referee correctly held that additional respondent-appellant insurer failed to show that it properly canceled its policy with the owner of the offending vehicle, where its witness had no first-hand knowledge of its having actually mailed either the final bill or a notice of cancellation to the owner of the offending vehicle, or of its regular procedures in mailing such bills and notices (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Ramirez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO. v. GAMBLE
250 A.D.2d 540 (1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 979
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Respondent, v. Gregory Gamble et al., Respondents, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 26, 1998
May 26, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
