1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 251 A.D.2d
  5. 251 A.D.2d 537 (1998)
 

EATMAN v. LYNFIELD

251 A.D.2d 537 (1998)

673 N.Y.S.2d 926

Charles Eatman et al., Respondents, v. David Lynfield et al., Defendants, and C. Glenn Schor, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 22, 1998

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment, as questions of fact exist as to whether an attorney-client relationship existed between him and the plaintiffs, and as to his degree of involvement, if any, in the alleged fraud (see, LaManna v Cahn Wollen Co., 249 A.D.2d 451; Messena v Manhattan & Bronx Surface...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases