Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that his conviction of robbery in the first degree is fatally inconsistent with his acquittal of criminal possession of stolen property in a previous trial under the same indictment. The jury in the first trial was charged that criminal possession of stolen property included as an essential element "the ability to exercise dominion or control over [the subject] property to the exclusion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
