1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 63 F.Supp.2d
  5. 63 F.Supp.2d 721 (1998)
 

THOMPSON v. DIRECT IMPACT CO.

No. Civ.A. 97-1250-A.

63 F.Supp.2d 721 (1998)

Jeffrey THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DIRECT IMPACT COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

August 14, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Lynn Murphy, Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff.

Bernard Joseph DiMuro, DiMuro, Ginsberg & Lieberman, Alexandria, VA, Michael Earl Barnsback, DiMuro, Ginsberg & Lieberman, P.C., Alexandria, VA, for defendant.

ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, motion for a new trial under Rule 59(a)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, these motions are DENIED.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases