1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 707 (1998)
 

GONZALEZ v. COUNTY OF TULARE

No. F025954.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 707 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 777

Margarito GONZALEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF TULARE et al. Defendants and Respondents; Borba-Mikaelian, Inc., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

July 20, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred A. Gallegos, Fresno, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kathleen Bales-Lange, County Counsel, Julia J. Roberts, Deputy County Counsel, and W. Phil Mace, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Houck & Hicks and Lloyd L. Hicks, Visalia, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent

OPINION

DIBIASO, Acting Presiding Justice.

Appellants Margarito Gonzalez and Ronnie Castillo appeal from an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer to their petition for administrative mandamus. The trial court agreed with respondents County of Tulare, Tulare County Board of Supervisors and Tulare County Planning Commission that although appellants had timely filed their mandate petition they had not timely served it The mandamus proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases