1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 218 Wis.2d
  5. 218 Wis.2d 550 (1998)
 

STATE v. CURTIS

No. 96-2884-CR.

218 Wis.2d 550 (1998)

582 N.W.2d 409

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 8, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Arthur B. Nathan of Nathan Law Office, S.C. of Racine.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Mary E. Burke, assistant attorney general.

Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ.

BROWN, J.

Gary Curtis appeals from his conviction for delivering drugs pursuant to §§ 161.41(1)(h)1 and 161.41(1)(cm)1, STATS., 1993-94.1 He contests several aspects of his trial. We consider the two most important issues to be whether it is necessary to have a Machner2 hearing in every claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and whether voice identification may be used to authenticate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases