1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 684 (1998)
 

ESTEVANOVICH v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

No. E018016.

81 Cal.Rptr.2d 684 (1998)

Jim ESTEVANOVICH et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

As Modified February 9, 1999.

Review Granted April 21, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory P. Priamos, Supervising Deputy City Attorney, Sharon J. Waters, Riverside and Diane C. Roth, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Timothy T. Coates, Beverly Hills, for Defendants and Appellants.

Harry H. Histen, Riverside, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

Following a nonjury trial, the court ruled that Riverside City Ordinance 6012 was unconstitutional as "violative of equal protection insofar as it restricts the hours of operation [of poolrooms]." The court enjoined and restrained the City of Riverside ("City") from enforcing restrictions on hours of operation. At a separate trial for the cause of action for inverse condemnation the parties stipulated that Jim Estevanovich...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases