Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that the complainant's statement identifying the defendant as the person who shot him was admissible as an excited utterance. The "statement was made spontaneously,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.